Thursday, November 22, 2007

Milena Velba Underage

Bernard Plantive #05


Plantive Bernard, Untitled, 2002, wood, casein, carbon black, 20 x 25 cm.

Table


Without conducting further action than just contact our gaze rests lazily on the space that the table circumscribed. He met the sizes and shapes. Recognition there is no problem. The table , fixed, presentation, submits this brief review gives us the elemental composition of a program: some squares appear in a grid which we perceive only the suggestion, an fixing pigment occupies the plan, revealing for the occasion the proportion of its strength with that of the plane that hosts them.

Our perception has little difficulty in identifying the properties of these objects, their strength, unity, stability, it is first and foremost those providing salience of their form, the balance of their face, despite the concealment of square and the possible segregation units, despite the torment of the pigment and shake our unification sensitive. The rectangle requires evidence of its form.

Here we are dealing with objects of perception, that require vision and invite those who look at the simple random structuring of their visual field. Also look there is confirmation of what he gave to the collection: a furtive meeting that he just said he was not on an equal footing with that thing, that it assured though, that unlike dreams, biting in reality, it was strictly separated from him. That's not aware that the eye injury is distinct from the world in which the object is placed.

strange spectacle of banality badge, a craft for just marked as a bit outrageous the act seems simple, almost useless. As if these works gave the impression they had just been crossed by a few acts who were looking and they had kept track of the passage. As if they gave back, like an echo fossil, the first craft that will deal with audacity disorder, or the second bold, in the hierarchy of techniques, which intends to organize (1) .

Is it because of the correctness of the figure? Is this due to the thickness that clearly separates the wall? No absorption in the visual field does not conceal any form. This which is covered is not nonexistent, no review needed to analyze possible components are hidden. The object is free spell. All is well.

There is nothing in what is reviewed in this subject matter could be questioned. An accident, perhaps, would raise our brows over the edge, a black square appears in broad daylight and with a candor suggests any delicate one might well believe depth, to an assembly of cubes, as in building blocks. But the deception goes no further, the illusion is quickly thwarted. It can not be given access to a sham bill also restraint and austerity. If you notice the features that extend the grid guessed, is to note the intentions of a man conscious of his act and who intends to "leave lying around" what he did by registered surveyors, which for betraying the action taken by the single issue of his work, and almost ironic detachment that brought him.

Why such a thing? How can she claim to exist?


Note:
1 Maybe these two stages, respectively represented by the array whose support is hosting a work-based wax, and one that is plaid and wrapped, they can approach advantageously Moira of Parmenidean (power that binds all being) for the first and Heraclitean logos for the second ( logos: word assembler and assembler of things) ideas promoted by Henry Maldiney in Aître of language and thought homes.

© Domains Art

0 comments:

Post a Comment